![]() Uterine Rupture
What is uterine rupture? The first is the more common thinning of the scar. It creates a window-like effect, and the technical term for this is called "dehiscence". It is thought that this occurs in about 1 of every 200 VBAC labors, however it is impossible to calculate the true numbers because the majority of these ruptures are asymptomatic, meaning there is no fetal distress, and the woman is unaware that this has occurred. The only way to detect a dehiscence is to do a manual exploration of the uterus after the birth or if the woman must have a cesarean after she has been laboring. The wound dehiscence heals itself in about 6 weeks and does not increase risk for future pregnancies. |
|
|
The second type is called catastrophic uterine rupture. This is extremely rare, and according to some sources is no more common during a VBAC labor than in the general population. Catastrophic rupture is when the scar seperates completely, and the fetus is expelled into the abdominal cavity. Prior to the rupture, there are distinctive changes in the fetal heart tones (the baby's heartbeat) called decelerations, where the heartbeat begins to drop significantly before returning to baseline. This is followed by a prolonged drop in the baby's heartbeat. It is imperative that emergency surgery be done at this point. This type of rupture is life threatening to both mother and baby. This is why it is recommended that VBAC births occur in hospitals capable of doing an emergency cesarean. Okay, now that we are all feeling nervous…the concept of a uterine rupture is very scary. But there is a lot of information out there and knowledge is power, so lets learn more, and put this in perspective. It is important to note that both types classify as uterine rupture as far as many studies and statistics are concerned. Facts:
One theory is that the uterus heals itself by regeneration of the muscle fibers, and not by scar tissue formation. Another theory is called fibroblast proliferation, which means that normal relation of smooth muscle to connective tissue is re-established.
So what?
Uterine rupture- what is the risk?
There is hope. Williams Obstetrical Textbook notes that at Parkland Hospital during the years of 1990-1994 there were 74,000 births. There were only 4 uterine ruptures. This is an incidence of 1 in 18,500 deliveries. None of these were VBACs. Parkland Hospital instituted a policy of not using pitocin to induce labor or augment labor in VBAC deliveries in 1990. At the time of the books last copyright in 2001 there were no uterine ruptures during VBAC labors in those 11 years.
Lets talk incisions!
The risk of rupture with a low vertical incision is 1.1% The risk of rupture with a low transverse incision is 0.19-0.8% There are two means by which to suture a uterine incision. Single layer and double layer. A single layer closure is one continuous line of stitches. A double layer closure is two layers of interrupted stitches. The double layer closure is stronger and associated with a much lower risk of uterine rupture.
So what makes me a good candidate for a VBAC?
I will add a few other criteria found in my research:
Important to note!!! "Rupture of a low transverse uterine incision, if it occurs is not generally catastrophic or life threatening to either the mother or baby. It is usually a dehiscence (separation) found by later exploration or elected repeat cesarean. To be life threatening, rupture of a uterine scar either extends into the rich blood supply found in the uterine corpus or fundus (the top) or disrupts the placenta, which is normally located in the uterine fundus" (the top). Let's put this all in perspective stats from Williams Obstetrics and Varney's The concept of uterine rupture is scary. It certainly is a risk to be considered when thinking about a VBAC. However it is important to note that nothing is with out risk. Lets say the risk of uterine rupture is 0.19-0.8% with a low transverse incision.
The point of this is not to be doom and gloom. The point is that uterine rupture needs to be put into perspective, that the risk is not an outlandishly high number, when in fact, the risk is very low when proper screening and proper precautions are taken.
|
|